More 'objectivity' from the Brewers beat writer:
Why are you so quick to be a Weeks apologist? I did nothing to insult him in my blog. I just pointed out some guys who have been run producers over that span. I "acknowledged" Weeks' average with all the others, didn't I? You need to simmer down on the Weeks stuff. We get it. You're the president, vice president and treasurer to the Rickie Weeks Fan Club, to the point where you perceive insults that aren't there. You really need to calm down. We get it. Weeks has been better in recent weeks. How could he not be? He was terrible for most of the first half. And he still strikes out far too much, refuses to even attempt a bunt and remains a defensive liability. But if you feel compelled to promote him at every turn and perceive insults that aren't there, go for it.I find it hard to believe he can't make his point without insulting the initial poster. Haudricourt is a joke. That the Journal-Sentinel allows this sort of conduct out of their writers is laughable. Why can't they hold their Brewers coverage to the higher standard this team deserves?
(appended thread title --1992)










