Time to have a serious discussion about our bench

0 Kudo

Author	Comment
TwinsBrewersWorldSeries	Time to have a serious discussion about our bench		Lead	[-]
Posts: 360 May 3, 2009 7:23 PM	Tags : counsell, formerbrewers, rivera, bench, mcgehee, duffy I am very happy with the way out team is playing right now, but if this trend holds, it appears we're going to have a great deal of close (or one run) games this year. With Braun day to day with back stiffness, Mike Rivera on the DL, and Counsell getting some starts at SS due to JJ's slow start I think we're especially weak right now in situational batting (1st and 3rd, 2 outs, pitcher spot up). These are the stats of our bench thus far: C Counsell .278/.381/.333/.714 36 AB M Rivera .308/.286/.462/.747 13 AB C McGehee .222/.222/.222/.444 9 AB C Duffy .125/.263/.188/.451 16 AB B Nelson .000/.053/.000/.053 18 AB The question is, is this a small sample and we can expect these numbers to improve or do we currently have a handful of AAAA players who are on the 25 man because we don't want to start the Arby clocks, don't feel our better prospects are ready defensively, or we simply can't afford to spend any money on our bench (thus no Edmonds, Graffy, etc.) Last Edited By: support May 29, 2009 7:00 PM. Edited 1 time.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Ennder		#1	[url]	[-]
Posts: 7504 May 3, 2009 7:25 PM	The samples are too small to make any conclusions about the bench at all. If you were worried about the bench going into the year you still should be worried, if you thought the bench was fine going into the season then nothing in those statlines suggest it isn't fine. A random 20 or fewer AB just doesn't mean anything.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
tyguy20204		#2	[url]	[-]
Posts: 888 May 3, 2009 8:02 PM	For what it's worth, I think Gamel will be called up when they're sure that he'll no longer qualify for Super 2 status. That way they'll have a quality LH pinch-hitter (Sorry, Brad) and someone to spell Billy Hall with from time to time.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
WisconsinSportsRule		#3	[url]	[-]
Posts: 219 May 3, 2009 8:11 PM	tyguy20204 wrote: For what it's worth, I think Gamel will be called up when they're sure that he'll no longer qualify for Super 2 status. That way they'll have a quality LH pinch-hitter (Sorry, Brad) and someone to spell Billy Hall with from time to time. The problem in bringing Gamel up is that he won't get those daily reps at 3rd, which is what he clearly needs.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
pogokat		#4	[url]	[-]
Posts: 8336 May 3, 2009 8:13 PM Dir of Minor League Ops	If they call Gamel up, it will be hall that's on the bench... --------------------------------------------- The world throws its light underneath your hair; 40 miles from Atlanta, this is nowhere.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
tyguy20204		#5	[url]	[-]
Posts: 889 May 3, 2009 8:20 PM	Yeah, you could definitely make those arguments (Wisconsin and pogokat), and you might be right, but I wouldn't mind seeing him transitioned in as a bench player to start, especially if the season wears on, we're in contention, and it's evident that the bench is a problem area.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
TheCrew07		#6	[url]	[-]
Posts: 2614 May 3, 2009 8:32 PM	If Gamel is on the bench they've given up on him at 3B. "You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation." - Plato "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
tyguy20204		#7	[url]	[-]
Posts: 890 May 3, 2009 8:59 PM	I don't necessarily agree with that.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
JCREW		#8	[url]	[-]
Posts: 4 May 3, 2009 9:13 PM	Regardless of whether or not we've given up on him at 3B, I don't want him up in a pinch-hitting role. He's a prospect and he should be getting playing time. Period. Although the sample size is small, one glaring thing is that we don't have that second veteran bat off the bench. (Kapler) Young guys don't seem to get in the right frame of mind to be off and on bench players. Counsell and Kapler seem like they're always ready to go. Brad, on the other hand has managed to strike out in almost half of his ABs (8 of 18). Unless we have a veteran to put in one of these places, I don't see the point in losing control of a slumping player just to put another youngster into a spot where veterans just seem to do better.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
dlk9s		#9	[url]	[-]
Posts: 2015 May 3, 2009 9:50 PM	Forgetting about the hitting numbers for a moment (small sample size, obviously), keep in mind that the guys on the bench also play positions in the field. We actually have a pretty nice bench from a versatility perspective. Counsell can play anywhere on the infield and it appears that McGehee can play anywhere but SS (I don't know if he can, but he hasn't). Duffy can play any OF position and play it well, it seems. Nelson is the most limited, but he still seems like a competent enough corner OF and can play 1B. Rivera is a backup C, and a good one at that. I feel that this gives the Brewers a nice advantage when it comes to substitutions because there are multiple options for every position. McGehee can even play catcher if need be.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
strawbossisevil		#10	[url]	[-]
Posts: 2118 May 3, 2009 10:19 PM	No way they bring up their top prospect to sit on the bench. At worst, he would be platooned with Hall. --------------------------------------------------------- We want to be winners, but we are just a bunch of whiners.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
JoeHova		#11	[url]	[-]
Posts: 5913 May 4, 2009 5:16 AM	tyguy20204 wrote: I don't necessarily agree with that. I don't either. Prince, a far better (and younger) prospect than Gamel, was used as a bench player during his first season. He was up for about 2 1/2 months and only got 3 starts in the field. That's not to say that I would be in favor of Gamel being used almost exclusively as a bench player but the team has shown the willingness to use top prospects in that role in the recent past. "God Save Donald Duck" - Ray Davies "I'm a lazy sod I'm a lazy sod I'm a lazy sod I'm so lazy" - Johnny Rotten
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
endaround		#12	[url]	[-]
Posts: 13685 May 4, 2009 6:31 AM	The difference there is Fielder had nothing to really work on in the minors. Gamel needs to learn a defensive position be it 3B/1B/OF at some point this season.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
BrewCrewIn2004		#13	[url]	[-]
Posts: 9001 May 4, 2009 6:38 AM	Gamel is not coming up until they have a starting spot for him somewhere. It would just not making any sense to sit him on the bench and not play everyday. View From Bernie's Chalet
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Invader3K		#14	[url]	[-]
Posts: 4750 May 4, 2009 6:39 AM	Yeah, I think Fielder was at least seen as being competent at first base, while Gamel still seems to be something of a butcher.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Brewer Fever		#15	[url]	[-]
Posts: 1697 May 4, 2009 7:49 AM	Look for Gamel to be brought up for the series at Minnesota to be our DH. At least according to Gammons... Mat Gamel is hitting over .370 and has five homers off left-handed pitchers with Milwaukee's Triple-A Louisville club. Bill Hall is hitting over .300, so Gamel may have to wait, although Doug Melvin is thinking of bringing Gamel up when the Brewers begin playing American League teams later this month and allowing him to DH. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=4124710&name=gammons_peter
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Invader3K		#16	[url]	[-]
Posts: 4754 May 4, 2009 7:56 AM	It still seems like it would be a bit of a waste to me...though they probably figure using lots of options with Gamel won't be a big issue. But beyond a few series against AL teams, what do they do with him then? Send him back down to AAA to continue his defensive work? What if he's killing the ball? Do you have to platoon him with Hall at that point? Bill Hall hasn't exactly played himself out of a starting role up to this juncture in the season. I guess I almost think they should just use Nelson in the DH role, assuming he's at least had one hit by that point. Anything is better than "Tony Gwynn - DH" like we saw last season, though.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Fatter than Joey		#17	[url]	[-]
Posts: 7219 May 4, 2009 8:09 AM Pure Yostian Hatred	No way they bring up their top prospect to sit on the bench. At worst, he would be platooned with Hall. Right -- I don't like the idea of Gamel platooning with Hall either. If Braun is going to miss a lot of time, it probably is the blue screen of death for 2009. If that is, in fact the case I'd try to get Hall enough PT so he could be traded. I would think Hall's stock has risen a lot from last year. Taking shallowness to new depths -- FtJ's new blog
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
JohnBriggs12		#18	[url]	[-]
Posts: 6056 May 4, 2009 8:22 AM	They can (and should) find another solution other than either Duffy or Nelson as a replacement for Braun if he were to end up on the DL. In Nelson's case, there is not only an offensive dropoff but a defensive one as well. Duffy is fine defensively but is basically Tony Gwynn Jr. with his bat. Internally, they could just stick Gamel out there in LF and let him learn on the job. People seem to forget too that Hall spent a year in CF. Is it that far fetched to put him in LF and bring Gamel up to play 3B? Externally, vets Jenkins, Edmonds, Catalanotto are still out there and still capable of being productive.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
endaround		#19	[url]	[-]
Posts: 13686 May 4, 2009 8:28 AM	No they really aren't capable of being productive. Jenkins would maybe give you a 750-780 OPS while platooned. Catalanatto would be worse with horrendous defense. Edmonds might be able to give you something.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Invader3K		#20	[url]	[-]
Posts: 4757 May 4, 2009 8:35 AM	My worry with Edmonds is he's older and probably not that great defensively anymore. I imagine he's better than the other options with the bat, though.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Time to have a serious discussion about our bench

Time to have a serious discussion about our bench

Quick Reply