Very smart by Suppan there
0 Kudo
2009-07-03 Brewers (Suppan) at Chicago (Zambrano) : 1:20 PM CT [Brewers lose, 2-1]
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 naivin |
#61 | |||
|
Posts: 2586 July 3, 2009 1:14 PM |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
southpaw121505 |
#62 | |||
|
Posts: 606 July 3, 2009 1:14 PM |
thank you soup
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
phxMILWfan |
#63 | |||
|
Posts: 783 July 3, 2009 1:15 PM |
nate82 wrote: nope. How about Soup there? Very nice. This team needs someone to toughen up. I'm not saying throwing at guys heads but the Brewers do get hit by pitches way too much and our pitchers never retaliate. They left Braun hung out to dry against the Pirates by not backing up his comments at all. "Close but not the cigar."- Telly Hughes |
|||
|
|
||||
|
pebadger |
#64 | |||
|
Posts: 1339 July 3, 2009 1:15 PM |
I don't like it as a practical matter right now. Soup has bee crusiing. Why give them a free runner?
As i THought, he'll walk Bradley now. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
SoCal Brew Crew Fan |
#65 | |||
|
Posts: 1496 July 3, 2009 1:16 PM |
Normally I'm not a fan of that, but nice job Soup.
Untuck'em for Rickie!!! |
|||
|
|
||||
|
sheethead |
#66 | |||
|
Posts: 1900 July 3, 2009 1:16 PM |
The only thing I don't like was it only grazed Lee.
Tanaka: You have no... you have no... marbles! You have no marbles!
Cerrano: Marbles? Huevos? |
|||
|
|
||||
|
jeffyscott |
#67 | |||
|
Posts: 1017 July 3, 2009 1:17 PM |
It was nice of the umpire to wait for the retaliation to occur, before giving the warnings, otherwise the team that does it first gets a freebie...or it
carries over to another game.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
sheethead |
#68 | |||
|
Posts: 1901 July 3, 2009 1:17 PM |
That is an easy DP if Lee isn't on the move. Bummer.
Tanaka: You have no... you have no... marbles! You have no marbles!
Cerrano: Marbles? Huevos? |
|||
|
|
||||
|
PrimeTime955 |
#69 | |||
|
Posts: 475 July 3, 2009 1:17 PM |
Still a good move by Soup regardless. You have to defend your teammates.
Bring Back the Stein wrote:Badger Hockey Blog |
|||
|
|
||||
|
pebadger |
#70 | |||
|
Posts: 1340 July 3, 2009 1:18 PM |
Way to work out of it, Soup.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
sargennm |
#71 | |||
|
Posts: 802 July 3, 2009 1:18 PM |
Man, nice to see the Brewers be on the right end of the inning-ending double play for once.
"Heir to the throne. Heir, heir, heir to the throne" - Prote-J |
|||
|
|
||||
|
phxMILWfan |
#72 | |||
|
Posts: 784 July 3, 2009 1:18 PM |
Yes! Really glad hitting Lee didn't cost a run.
"Close but not the cigar."- Telly Hughes |
|||
|
|
||||
|
naivin |
#73 | |||
|
Posts: 2587 July 3, 2009 1:18 PM |
Gonna be very interesting to see if Zambrano can keep it together (especially with Suppan due up).
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Mr QL |
#74 | |||
|
Posts: 928 July 3, 2009 1:19 PM |
Like the move by Soup. You hit our guy, we hit yours. That should be the end of it.
SHOUSE
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
jeffyscott |
#75 | |||
|
Posts: 1018 July 3, 2009 1:20 PM |
I hate these red hats. I looked up to see a double play ball and for a second I'm thinking that the Cardinals are going to turn a double play...
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Aytumious |
#76 | |||
|
Posts: 478 July 3, 2009 1:24 PM |
I'm not a big fan of giving free baserunners when the beaning of our guy pretty clearly wasn't intentional.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
naivin |
#77 | |||
|
Posts: 2588 July 3, 2009 1:26 PM |
Aytumious wrote: When that nut job is the opposing pitcher, its a good move. he's just stupid enough to get tossed. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
southpaw121505 |
#78 | |||
|
Posts: 607 July 3, 2009 1:26 PM |
So what, you protect your guy regardless, you see how Prince looked into the dugout? I really dont think Prince cares at all if it was intentional or not,
there was a fastball thrown near his head, you retaliate, period
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
bucks2281 |
#79 | |||
|
Posts: 1836 July 3, 2009 1:29 PM |
Ha. The morons at Wrigley think that was intentional.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Aytumious |
#80 | |||
|
Posts: 479 July 3, 2009 1:30 PM |
southpaw121505 wrote:Protect them from unintentional bean balls? How does that work? |
|||
|
|
||||
